Soluble complement receptor type 1 inhibits the complement pathway and prevents contractile failure in the postischemic heart: Evidence that complement activation is required for neutrophil-mediated reperfusion injury

Abstract

Background. Complement-mediated neutrophil activation has been hypothesized to be an important mechanism of reperfusion injury. It has been proposed that soluble complement receptor 1 (sCR1), a potent inhibitor of both classical and alternative complement pathways, may prevent the complement-dependent activation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) that occurs within postischemic myocardium and thereby inhibit PMN-derived free radical generation and prevent postischemic contractile failure. Therefore, we performed studies to determine the effects of sCR1 on contractile function, PMN adhesion, complement deposition, and PMN-derived free radical generation in the postischemic heart. Methods and Results. Studies were performed in an isolated rat heart model in which the isolated effects of given cellular or humoral factors could be determined. Plasma and PMNs were present to study the effects of sCR1 on contractile function, coronary flow, leukocyte adhesion, complement deposition, and PMN-derived free radical generation. Isolated rat hearts were perfused by the method of Langendorff (n=10 in each group) and subjected to 20 minutes of global ischemia and reperfusion with PMNs and plasma in the presence or absence of sCR1. Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), coronary flow (CF), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and rate-pressure product (RPP) were measured during the preischemic period, during 1-minute control infusion of PMNs and plasma, and on reflow following 20 minutes of global ischemia. During the preischemic control infusion, no significant alterations in the physiologic parameters were observed, and there was no measurable free radical generation. Reperfusion with sCR1 markedly improved the recovery of postischemic contractile function. LVDP after 45 minutes of reperfusion was 76±9.8% compared with 32±6.2% (P