Long-term, high-dose opioid prescription for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: an observational study

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Opioid prescriptions for chronic pain have risen sharply over the last 25 years; harms associated with these drugs are related to dose and length of use. Aim: The main aim of this study was to identify patients prescribed long-term, high-dose (LTHD) opioids in the community and to assess the prevalence of such use. Design & setting: An observational study of opioid prescribing in two demographically dissimilar GP practices in North Wales, UK. Method: Details of opioid prescriptions were collected for 22 841 patients, of whom 1488 (6.5%) were being prescribed opioids on the census date. Exhaustive examination of the data identified all patients who were prescribed oral morphine equivalent doses of ≥120 mg/day for ≥1 year. Results: All these patients were being prescribed ≥120 mg/day, as a single drug, morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, or buprenorphine, irrespective of opioid polypharmacy. Across both practices, 1.71/1000 patients were identified as LTHD users of opioid medication for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). Prevalence was similar in the two practices. Repetition of the process until January 2021 showed no change in the pattern. Conclusion: This study offers confirmation that a significant group of patients are prescribed long-term opioid medication for chronic pain at doses that are unlikely to be effective in reducing pain, but are likely to have harmful consequences. The findings offer a simple, reliable, and practical method of data extraction to identify these patients individually from routinely collected prescribing data, which will help in monitoring and treating individuals and establishing the problem prevalence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bailey, J., Gill, S., & Poole, R. (2022). Long-term, high-dose opioid prescription for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: an observational study. BJGP Open, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0217

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free