The resident classification scale: Is it a valid measure of functional dependence?

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the validity of the Resident Classification Scale (RCS) in measuring functional dependence. Methods: Participants newly assessed in hospital as requiring residential care were randomised to receive either transitional care or traditional inpatient hospital care. At the 4 month follow-up, the RCS and modified Barthel Index were administered. Inter- (n = 21) and intrarater (n = 10) reliability of the RCS was assessed. Results: A total of 317 participants were recruited. Interrater reliability for the RCS was high (ICC = 0.93) as was the intrarater reliability (Spearman's r = 0.84). There was strong agreement between the RCS and the modified Barthel Index. Conclusions: The RCS has been specifically designed to assess the needs of individuals requiring long-term residential care. With minor modifications, the RCS has the potential to be a useful research tool. © 2006 COTA National Seniors Partnership.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stepien, J. M., White, H., Wundke, R., Giles, L. C., Whitehead, C. H., & Crotty, M. (2006). The resident classification scale: Is it a valid measure of functional dependence? Australasian Journal on Ageing, 25(1), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2006.00139.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free