Epistemic hegemony: The western Straitjacket and post-colonial scars in academic publishing

38Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The field of International Relations (IR) is barely ‘international’. Scholars have voiced their concerns and as a result, we have witnessed calls for diversity and inclusion in IR, be it in publication or in syllabi. Notwithstanding, the misrepresentation of non-Western scholars in the production of knowledge is significant. This article sheds light on the dynamics of publishing from a non-Western perspective and reinforces Post-Colonial epistemological critiques in IR. Based on the latest dataset from the International Studies Association (ISA)’s journals, this article argues that the current setting of IR journals is not suited for and receptive of non-Western scholars and epistemologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Noda, O. (2020). Epistemic hegemony: The western Straitjacket and post-colonial scars in academic publishing. Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 63(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202000107

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free