Towards more extensible MetaCASE tools

17Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, we suggest a solution to several limitations of current metaCASE technology: (i) the limited number of modelling levels, (ii) the rigid separation between those levels, (iii) the limited boot-strapping possibilities, (iv) the hardcoding of various types of information (e.g. GUI related information), and (v) the inability to record links between semantically related (e.g. referrentially redundant) constructs. Our proposal is centered around a 2-layer metamodelling language called MetaL. MetaL is characterised by ubiquitous reflexivity (meta-circularity) and extended reification capabilities. The language is presented and applied to illustrative examples. Its pros and cons are discussed and an on-going prototypical metaCASE implementation is reported. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Englebert, V., & Heymans, P. (2007). Towards more extensible MetaCASE tools. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4495 LNCS, pp. 454–468). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72988-4_32

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free