Towards A Meta Theory Of Accounting For Knowledge Management: Review The Realities To Stage The Critical Thinking Of Knowledge Business Model

  • Mohammad A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Knowledge management has always seen as an engine to convert tacit knowledge into explicit. Knowledge assets are facilitators to make such conversion. Knowledge management paradigm is a turning point in the management theories of business. When such paradigm has business dominance, it is time to question how to account for it ? Accounting for "how" and "why" has been largely neglected by the professional bodies and scholars of accounting. Accounting for knowledge management paradigm can be very critical in terms of questioning some of the fundamental assumptions of financial statements. The focus has been very narrow and anachronistic. Accounting for knowledge management is a problematic issue warrant further investigations. Its involves far more than the need to address the paradoxes and lacks of accounting model and practices. The extension of institutional accounting theories highlights how accounting against knowledge management is totally different from accounting for operations?)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohammad, A. A. (2017). Towards A Meta Theory Of Accounting For Knowledge Management: Review The Realities To Stage The Critical Thinking Of Knowledge Business Model. Studies in Business and Economics, 20(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.29117/sbe.2017.0098

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free