Criteria for Quality Assessment and Inclusion in SCOPUS: a Comparison of Bibliometric Indicators in Three BH Journals

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Based on the selected corpus of journals, this paper aims to analyse the criteria for their inclusion in the bibliographic and citation database Scopus. The paper takes a sample of three scientific journals from Bosnia and Herzegovina – Social Sciences and Humanities Studies, Philologist – Journal of Language, Literary and Cultural Studies and Historical Views. The results of this paper show that the DHS journal follows the official Scopus guidelines, which indicates the lack of a causal relationship between the journal indexing criteria and its implementation in practice – indexing Philologist and Historical Views while rejecting Social Sciences and Humanities Studies. The importance of these results lies in the systematization of criteria for indexing scientific journals in a specific database, as well as in a better understanding of the Scopus inclusion process, guided by a comparison of recent bibliometric indicators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adilović, E. (2022). Criteria for Quality Assessment and Inclusion in SCOPUS: a Comparison of Bibliometric Indicators in Three BH Journals. Bosniaca, 2022(27), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2022.27.169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free