Principlism and moral dilemmas: A new principle

33Citations
Citations of this article
129Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Moral conflicts occur in theories that involve more than one principle. I examine basic ways of dealing with moral dilemmas in medical ethics and in ethics generally, and propose a different approach based on a principle I call the "mutuality principle". It is offered as an addition to Tom Beauchamp and James Childress' principlism. The principle calls for the mutual enhancement of basic moral values. After explaining the principle and its strengths, I test it by way of an examination of three responses - in the recent Festschrift for Dr Raanon Gillon - to a case involving parental refusal of a blood transfusion. The strongest response is the one that comes closest to the requirements of the mutuality principle but yet falls short. I argue that the mutuality principle provides an explicit future orientation in principlism and gives it greater moral coherence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DeMarco, J. P. (2005). Principlism and moral dilemmas: A new principle. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.007856

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free