Validity and reliability of the persian version of the dyspnea-12 questionnaire in assessing dyspnea among COPD patients

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Dyspnea is a distressing symptom of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The Dyspnea-12 questionnaire, a well-established instrument for assessing different dimensions of dyspnea validated in multiple languages, lacked a Persian version. This study aimed to adapt and validate a Persian version of Dyspnea-12. Results: The Persian version of Dyspnea-12 demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.982, Composite Reliability = 0.985). Criterion validity analysis strongly correlated with Dyspnea-12 and CAT scores (ρ = 0.698, p < 0.001). Factor analysis confirmed a single-factor structure consistent with the original version. Inter-item correlations ranged from 0.3 to 0.9. Construct validity indices indicated a satisfactory model fit (CFI = 0.904, SRMR = 0.044), though RMSEA (0.188) suggested areas for improvement. Pulmonary function analysis revealed significant associations between FEV₁ and Dyspnea-12 scores (p = 0.042) and FVC (p = 0.017), linking dyspnea severity with lung function decline.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alishapour, E., Nayeri, M. A., Bahrami, R., Haghshenas, A., & Mehrabi, S. (2025). Validity and reliability of the persian version of the dyspnea-12 questionnaire in assessing dyspnea among COPD patients. BMC Research Notes, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07290-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free