The Emergence of Hard-Line Islamic Idiology: Impact of Differences Understanding Discourse on the Qur'an

  • Hamid M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The reasons for the differences in the understanding of discourse in the text of the Qor'an which raises the movement of Islamic ideology is: a. Internal factors causing the text bring ambiguous meaning; b. Theoretical approach used by Islamic scholars; c. the different abilities toward Arabic language; d. grade of different readers acceptance; e. The external factors relating to the purpose of providing a holistic meaning, such as: the interests of political, economic, social and cultural. This research is a qualitative research method that is ideographic language Sociology approach, because the study involves aspects of language and social, so that there is a difference of discourse. Implications of the new findings obtained from this study that a text when assessed or understood by a particular theoretical approach would result in an idea or a certain discourse anyway, because of the hidden meaning in a text has a certain tensile strength or power that can affect the psyche of the reader. Therefore, text language acquisition factors and intellect-mind of the reader becomes an important factor in understanding a text. If the sense-mind become deadlock, the speech, action, and statutes of the carrier text (Prophet Muhammad) can be used as a reference that is a support in understanding the text. Because of between three elements: the text and its carrier as well as the readers are always interrelated and inseparable , Thus, the results of this research is the development of the theory of pragmatics (Pragmatic Theory) in the study of language and literature, the reader is entitled to receive and interpret what he read.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hamid, M. (2017). The Emergence of Hard-Line Islamic Idiology: Impact of Differences Understanding Discourse on the Qur’an. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(05), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2205049399

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free