Thymectomy for juvenile myasthenia gravis: a narrative review

Abstract

Background and Objective: Thymectomy as a management strategy for juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) has been increasingly adopted with the advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques. This review evaluates existing evidence regarding the surgical management of JMG, including the benefits of surgical compared to medical therapy, important considerations when evaluating surgical candidacy and determining optimal timing of intervention. In addition, we provide an overview of the open, thoracoscopic and robotic surgical approaches available for thymectomy and compare the existing data to characterize optimal surgical management. Methods: A thorough literature review was conducted for full length research articles, including systematic reviews, retrospective cohort studies and case series, published between January 2000 and July 2023 regarding open, thoracoscopic or robotic thymectomy for management of JMG. Reference lists of the identified articles were manually searched for additional studies. Evidence was summarized in a narrative fashion with the incorporation of the authors’ knowledge gained through clinical experience. Key Content and Findings: Although data specific to JMG are limited to small retrospective cohort studies, available evidence supports equal to greater disease control following thymectomy versus pharmacologic management. Furthermore, outcomes may be optimized when surgery is performed earlier in the disease course, particularly for patients who are post-pubertal with generalized or severe disease and those necessitating high-dose steroid administration thereby limiting its metabolic and growth inhibitory effects. Open transsternal resection is the historic gold-standard; however, as surgeons become more comfortable with thoracoscopic and robotic-assisted thymectomy, an increasing proportion of patients are expected to undergo thymectomy. At present, the data available is unable to support conclusions regarding which surgical approach is superior; however, minimally invasive approaches may be non-inferior while offering superior cosmesis and decreased morbidity. Conclusions: Higher-level investigation through the use of multi-institutional databases and randomized prospective trials is warranted in order to understand which child warrants thymectomy, at what point in their disease course and their development, and which surgical approach will optimize postoperative outcomes.