Fluid bolus therapy in emergency department patients: Indications and physiological changes

17Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present paper is to study the indications for fluid bolus therapy (FBT) and its associated physiological changes in ED patients. Methods: Prospective observational study of FBT in a tertiary ED, we recorded indications, number, types and volumes, resuscitation goals and perceived success rates of FBT. Moreover, we studied key physiological variables before, 10 min, 1 h and 2 h after FBT. Results: We studied 500 FBT episodes (750 [500–1250] mL). Median age was 59 (36–76) years and 57% were male. Shock was deemed present in 135 (27%) patients, septic shock in 80 (16%), and cardiogenic shock in 30 (6%). Overall, 0.9% saline (84%) was the most common fluid and hypotension the most common indication (70%). ‘Avoidance of hospital/ICU admission’ was the goal perceived to have the greatest success rate (85%). However, although mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased (P < 0.01) and heart rate (HR) decreased (P = 0.04) at 10 min (P = 0.01), both returned to baseline at 1 and 2 h. In contrast, respiratory rate (RR) increased at 1 (P < 0.01) and 2 h (P = 0.03) and temperature decreased at 1 and 2 h (both P < 0.001). In patients with shock, 1 h after FBT, there was a median 3 mmHg increase in MAP (P = 0.01) but no change in HR (P = 0.44), while RR increased (P < 0.01) and temperature decreased (P = 0.01). Conclusions: In ED, FBT is used mostly in patients without shock. However, after an immediate haemodynamic effect, FBT is associated with absent or limited physiological changes at 1 or 2 h. Even in shocked patients, the changes in MAP at 1 or 2 h after FBT are small.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bihari, S., Teubner, D. J., Prakash, S., Beatty, T., Morphett, M., Bellomo, R., & Bersten, A. (2016). Fluid bolus therapy in emergency department patients: Indications and physiological changes. EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, 28(5), 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12621

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free