Resonance frequency analysis, insertion torque, and bone to implant contact of 4 implant surfaces: Comparison and correlation study in sheep

22Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Primary stability is evaluated using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and insertion torque (IT). Although there is a strong correlation between RFA and IT, studies failed to find a correlation between RFA and bone to implant contact (BIC) or IT and BIC. Objective: To compare RFA, IT, and BIC of SLA, SLActive, Euroteknika, and TiUnite implant surfaces and evaluate the correlation between them. Materials and Methods: Thirtytwo implants were placed in 8 sheep. RFA and IT were recorded. Animals were killed at 1 and 2 months. Results: A significant difference was found in RFA between the 4 surfaces. No significant difference was found for IT. Mean BIC was different between all 4 surfaces. A significant positive correlation was found between RFA and IT with SLA. No significant correlation was found between RFA and BIC and between IT and BIC at 1 and 2 months. Conclusions: Implants with 4 different surfaces have similar IT values but different RFA and BIC. Additionally irrespective of the implant surface, there is no correlation between IT and BIC and between RFA and BIC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dagher, M., Mokbel, N., Jabbour, G., & Naaman, N. (2014). Resonance frequency analysis, insertion torque, and bone to implant contact of 4 implant surfaces: Comparison and correlation study in sheep. Implant Dentistry, 23(6), 672–678. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000155

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free