Impact Deceleration Differences on Natural Grass Versus Synthetic Turf High School Football Fields

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

American football has the highest rate of concussions in United States high school sports. Within American football, impact against the playing surface is the second-most common mechanism of injury. The objective of this study was to determine if there is a difference in impact deceleration between natural grass and synthetic turf high school football fields. A Century Body Opponent Bag (BOB) manikin was equipped with a Riddell football helmet and 3 accel-erometers were placed on the forehead, apex of the head, and right ear. The manikin was dropped from a stationary position onto its front, back, and left side onto natural grass (n = 10) and synthetic turf (n = 9) outdoor football fields owned and maintained by public and private institutions on O‘ahu, Hawai‘i. Data was collected on 1,710 total drops. All accelerometers in forward and backward falls, and 1 accelerometer in side falls showed significantly greater impact deceleration on synthetic turf compared to the natural grass surfaces (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Villanueva, N. C., Chun, I. K. H., Fujiwara, A. S., Leibovitch, E. R., Yamamoto, B. E., & Yamamoto, L. G. (2024). Impact Deceleration Differences on Natural Grass Versus Synthetic Turf High School Football Fields. Hawaii Journal of Health and Social Welfare, 83(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.62547/hkis1850

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free