A comparison of continuous and event-based rainfall-runoff (RR) modelling using EPA-SWMM

52Citations
Citations of this article
163Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigates the comparative performance of event-based and continuous simulation modelling of a stormwater management model (EPA-SWMM) in calculating total runoff hydrographs and direct runoff hydrographs. Myponga upstream and Scott Creek catchments in South Australia were selected as the case study catchments and model performance was assessed using a total of 36 streamflow events from the period of 2001 to 2004. Goodness-of-fit of the EPA-SWMM models developed using automatic calibration were assessed using eight goodness-of-fit measures including Nash-Sutcliff efficiency (NSE), NSE of daily high flows (ANSE), Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE), etc. The results of this study suggest that event-based modelling of EPA-SWMM outperforms the continuous simulation approach in producing both total runoff hydrograph (TRH) and direct runoff hydrograph (DRH).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hossain, S., Hewa, G. A., & Wella-Hewage, S. (2019). A comparison of continuous and event-based rainfall-runoff (RR) modelling using EPA-SWMM. Water (Switzerland), 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030611

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free