Quantitative tracking of edema, hemorrhage, and microvascular obstruction in subacute myocardial infarction in a porcine model by MRI

101Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Pathophysiological responses after acute myocardial infarction include edema, hemorrhage, and microvascular obstruction along with cellular damage. The in vivo evolution of these processes simultaneously throughout infarct healing has not been well characterized. The purpose of our study was to quantitatively monitor the time course of these mechanisms by MRI in a porcine model of myocardial infarction. Ten pigs underwent MRI before coronary occlusion with subgroups studied at day 2 and weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 post-infarction. Tissue characterization was performed using quantitative T2 and T2* maps to identify edema and hemorrhage, respectively. Contrast-enhanced MRI was used for infarct/ microvascular obstruction delineation. Inflammation was reflected by T2 fluctuations, however at day 2, edema and hemorrhage had counter-acting effects on T2. Hemorrhage (all forms) and mineralization (calcium) could be identified by T2* in the presence of edema. Simultaneous resolution of microvascular obstruction and T2* abnormality suggested that the two phenomenon were closely associated during the healing process. Our study demonstrates that quantitative T2 and T2* mapping techniques allow regional, longitudinal, and cross-subject comparisons and give insights into histological and tissue remodeling processes. Such in vivo characterization will be important in grading severity and evaluating treatment strategies for myocardial infarction, potentially improving clinical outcomes. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghugre, N. R., Ramanan, V., Pop, M., Yang, Y., Barry, J., Qiang, B., … Wright, G. A. (2011). Quantitative tracking of edema, hemorrhage, and microvascular obstruction in subacute myocardial infarction in a porcine model by MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 66(4), 1129–1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22855

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free