Gettier and factivity in Indo-Tibetan epistemology

19Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The similarities between contemporary externalist theories of knowledge and classical Indian and Tibetan theories of knowledge are striking. Drawing on comparisons with Timothy Williamson's recent work, I address related topics in Indo-Tibetan epistemology and show that correct analysis of these issues requires externalist theories of mind and knowledge. The topics addressed range from a discussion of possible Gettier cases in the Tibetan philosophical tradition to an assessment of arguments for and against the existence of factive mental states/events that fail to be knowledge states/events. I conclude by explaining how these matters in Indian and Tibetan epistemology can inform us about the viability of externalist epistemologies of the sort articulated by Williamson. © 2007 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stoltz, J. (2007). Gettier and factivity in Indo-Tibetan epistemology. Philosophical Quarterly, 57(228), 394–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.493.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free