When meeting someone for the very first time one spontaneously categorizes the seen person on the basis of his/her appearance. Categorization is based on the association between some physical features and category labels that can be social (character trait...) or non-social (tall, thin). Surprisingly little is known about how such associations are formed, particularly in the social domain. Here, we aimed at testing whether social and non-social category learning may be dissociated. We presented subjects with a large number of faces that had to be rated according to social or non-social labels, and induced an association between a facial feature (inter-eye distance) and the category labels using two different pro-cedures. In a first experiment, we used a feedback procedure to reinforce the association; behavioral measures revealed an association between the physical feature manipulated and abstract non-social categories, while no evidence for an association with social labels could be found. In a second experiment, we used passive exposure to the association between physical features and labels; we obtained behavioral evidence for learning of both social and non-social categories. These results support the view of the specificity of social cate-gory learning; they suggest that social categories are best acquired through unsupervised procedures that can be considered as a simplified proxy for group transmission. © 2012 Gamond, Tallon-Baudry, Guyon, Lemaréchal, Hugueville and George.
CITATION STYLE
Gamond, L., Tallon-Baudry, C., Guyon, N., Lemaréchal, J. D., Hugueville, L., & George, N. (2012). Behavioral evidence for differences in social and non-social category learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(AUG). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00291
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.