Comparison of antibiotic discs from different sources

48Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Antibiotic discs from Oxoid, Mast, AB Biodisk, Difco, and Baltimore Biological Laboratories were compared, where discs of similar antibiotic content were available, in diffusion-sensitivity tests against organisms of known sensitivity. Discs from Oxoid and Mast gave zones 1-5 mm larger than discs from other manufacturers with penicillin 2 units, ampicillin 10 μg, cephalothin 30 μg, methicillin 10 μg, carbenicillin 100μg, erythromycin 15μg, chloramphenicol 50μg, and trimethoprim 1·25 μg, while discs containing aminoglycoside antibiotics, lincomycin, fusidic acid, tetracycline, nalidixic acid, penicillin 10 units, and polymyxin B gave similar zone sizes whatever the source. Where tested, different batches of single discs from the same source did not vary significantly in antibiotic content as indicated by variation in zone size; but with some antibiotics Multodisks gave larger zones than single discs from the same source. The implications of these differences are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, D. F., & Kothari, D. (1975). Comparison of antibiotic discs from different sources. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 28(10), 779–783. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.28.10.779

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free