Induction of B cell apoptosis by TH0, but not TH2, CD4+ T cells

14Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Engagement of the T cell receptor molecules with MHC-antigen complexes presented by B cells ascertains antigen specificity in T cell-dependent help. Ligation of MHC molecules on the surface of B cells, however, has not only been implicated in antigen-specific T-B cell interaction, but has also been linked to the induction of B cell apoptosis. To examine the role of T helper cells in either induction of immunoglobulin synthesis or B cell apoptotic death, we have facilitated T cell receptor-MHC interaction through a bacterial superantigen. CD4+ T cell clones could be categorized into two clearly distinct subsets based upon their ability to promote B cell help in the presence of superantigen. One subset of T cell clones supported immunoglobulin synthesis, and thus functioned as effective helper cells. B cells interacting with the second subset of T cells did not differentiate into antibody-secreting cells, but underwent apoptosis. Both types of helper cells were able to provide contact help after anti-CD3 stimulation. Induction of apoptosis was a dominant phenomenon; the addition of the superantigen suppressed immunoglobulin production in B cells activated by anti-CD3- stimulated helper T cells, indicating that the T cells delivered an apoptotic signal to the B cell. T cell clones providing effective MHC restrictive B cell help could be distinguished from T cells facilitating B cell apoptosis based on their lymphokine secretion profile. Induction of B cell apoptosis was a feature of T cells with a TH0 lymphokine pattern. Promotion of MHC- restricted B cell help was associated with a TH2 lymphokine profile. TH1- derived cytokines alone could not substitute for apoptosis-inducing T cells.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

He, X., Zhong, W., Goronzy, J. J., & Weyand, C. M. (1995). Induction of B cell apoptosis by TH0, but not TH2, CD4+ T cells. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 95(2), 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci117699

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free