Dulcor misericordiae. Justicia y misericordia en el ejercicio de la autoridad canónica. I. Historia

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the early stages of canon law there was a specific need to intervene to ensure equity in given situations. Canonical equity began to take two forms: perfect justice and benign intervention. These two «souls» have coexisted since the start. Equity encompasses epikeia when the general nature of the law prevents the just appraisal of a specific case. Three representative cases are considered to provide a clearer understanding of the medieval canonical doctrine on aequitas: a letter by St. Augustine in the Decretum Gratiani; a passage from a decretal by Honorius III contained in the Liber Extra; and the great debate between Martinus Gosia and Bulgarus. A number of conclusions as to the ongoing value of equity and some hermeneutical rules relating to its application are drawn on the basis of this discussion.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Otaduy, J. (2016). Dulcor misericordiae. Justicia y misericordia en el ejercicio de la autoridad canónica. I. Historia. Ius Canonicum, 56(112), 585–619. https://doi.org/10.15581/016.112.585-619

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free