A Comparison of Conventional Blocks and Stabilized Earth Blocks as Building Materials in Uganda

  • E.O.E. N
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The high cost of conventional cement and sand blocks in Uganda has led to the widespread adoption of alternatives like wattle bricks, compressed earth blocks, and burnt bricks. Compressed earth blocks are a biodegradable, energy efficient, and eco-friendly building material made from damp soil compressed at high pressure. They reduce environmental hazards and deforestation without firewood. Case study methodology was used and deliberatesampling for collection of data. SPSS v20 was used for the analysis. The result shows that Stabilized Earth Materialshave positive relationship on satisfaction such that it causes 0.651 satisfaction against Conventional Blocks which is 0.602. It revealed a significant impact of Stabilized Earth Materials on cost with 4.8% difference. It is recommended that construction manager should make more use of stabilized earth materials to reduce cost and improve quality Keywords: Conventional blocks, stabilized earth blocks, building materials

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

E.O.E., N., & Nancy A, B. . (2024). A Comparison of Conventional Blocks and Stabilized Earth Blocks as Building Materials in Uganda. INOSR APPLIED SCIENCES, 12(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.59298/inosras/2024/12.2.9510300

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free