Attention is biased to near surfaces

12Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is thought that attention is allocated to figural items over adjacent ground stimuli. It is unclear which attribute of figures drives any previously observed attentional effects (e.g., nearness or shapedness). Moreover, it is unclear whether previous attentional effects are automatic or strategy driven. In the present series of experiments, we tested whether attention is allocated to the nearer of two surfaces under condition where near/far was not confounded with shaped/shapelessness. Using a temporal order judgment paradigm, in the first experiment, we showed that attention is allocated to the nearer of two surfaces. Furthermore, by using the stimuli themselves as the temporal order probe in Experiment 2, we found that this effect is independent of previous attentional allocation across the visual field. A third experiment ruled out the possibility that lateral inhibition by the pretarget backdrop was responsible for attentional bias toward near surfaces. Overall, our results converge to show that near surfaces attract attention. © 2013 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

West, G. L., Pratt, J., & Peterson, M. A. (2013). Attention is biased to near surfaces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(6), 1213–1220. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0455-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free