A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Acceptability, Implementation, Equity

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This work provides a synthesis of the perceptions of people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and healthcare professionals about the acceptability, implementation, and equity of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). A qualitative evidence synthesis was carried out. Three online databases (Medline, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched. Qualitative articles which were available in Spanish or English were included. A descriptive thematic synthesis was conducted according to PRISMA and ENTREQ guidelines. Thirty-two references met the inclusion criteria of the study and were included out of an initial 345 identified references. Seven main themes were identified: (a) acceptability, (b) adaptation to the insulin pump, (c) facilitators for the adequate use of insulin pump, (d) variability of acceptability, (e) barriers for the use of insulin pump, (f) feasibility and implementation considerations, and (g) equity. CSII is well accepted by most people with T1DM, with some exceptions. CSII can relieve management burden, increase autonomy and flexibility and improve family relationships. There were multiple perceived barriers to its continued use. Future studies should continue to analyze inequalities in access and use of the CSII.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toledo-Chavarri, A., Delgado, J., Padilla, M., & Rodríguez-Martín, B. (2024, December 1). A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Acceptability, Implementation, Equity. Nursing and Health Sciences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.13177

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free