Financing for Development: The Gap between Words and Deeds since Monterrey

19Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Monterrey Consensus agreed at the UN summit on Financing for Development in 2002 promised a breakthrough in terms of donor generosity, aid effectiveness and new means of financing. However, the development orientation of world leaders proved to be short-lived. This is even though our evaluation reveals progress since Monterrey in some areas, notably debt relief and private (FDI) flows. Calls for substantially scaling-up regular aid had less effect than envisaged, and financial innovations have contributed only marginally to overall development financing so far. Nor is there much progress from the perspective of critics focusing on the quality of aid. In particular, the targeting of aid according to need and merit leaves much to be desired. The gap between words and deeds continues to be wide with regard to aid proliferation and donor co-ordination as well. © 2013 Overseas Development Institute.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nunnenkamp, P., & Thiele, R. (2013). Financing for Development: The Gap between Words and Deeds since Monterrey. Development Policy Review, 31(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2013.00602.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free