Relationship between Maxillary Sinus Hypoplasia and Maxillary Occlusal Cant: A Cone Beam CT Study

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction. Maxillary sinus hypoplasia (MSH) has been reported to cause a cant in the orbital plane. No similar reports exist about the possible impact on the maxilla. The aim of this study was to assess if MSH is associated with maxillary occlusal plane (MOP) cant and if dental or mandibular factors influenced the existence of the MOP cant. Methods. 80 cone beam CT images of subjects with MSH were analyzed for the type of MSH, degree of MOP cant, open or cross bite, mandibular asymmetry, and degenerative joint disease of the temporomandibular joints. The subjects were compared with a control group matched by age and gender. Results. The degree of MOP cant (range 0-5.1°) was not statistically significantly different in unilateral vs. bilateral MSH or between the different types of MSH. The frequency of open bite, crossbite, mandibular asymmetry, or degenerative joint disease in unilateral vs. bilateral MSH or between the different types of MSH was not statistically significantly different. Between the case and control, there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of MOP cant (1.3±1.1° vs. 1.1±0.9°, respectively) or frequency of dental and mandibular factors. There was low positive linear correlation between MOP cant and mandibular symmetry in MSH subjects (Spearman's rho=0.23) and controls (Spearman's rho=0.187). Conclusions. The data suggests a view of the alveolar bone as the adaptable skeletal unit to ensure and bridge the functionality between the nasomaxillary complex and TMJ system-two systems with very different function, and therefore largely independent "matrix units."

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alsufyani, N. A., Major, M. P., & Major, P. W. (2022). Relationship between Maxillary Sinus Hypoplasia and Maxillary Occlusal Cant: A Cone Beam CT Study. BioMed Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4651514

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free