Effect of differing proportions of protein-rich common vetch seeds (Vicia sativa L. cultivar Slovena) in organic diets for broiler chickens

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The common vetch is a legume with low requirements for soil type and water availability and a good weed suppression together with an intercropping partner, thereby recommending itself for organic agriculture, especially in view of climate change. The use of the protein-rich seeds of common vetch for poultry, however, is limited due to anti-nutritional factors (ANF). This study was conducted to examine the use of common vetch seeds (cultivar: Slovena) in 100% organic diets for slow-growing broiler chickens. The common vetch seeds were found to be rich in protein and lysine (343 and 21.5 g/kg dry matter), and their vicine (5.69 g), convicine (0.75 g) and γ-glutamyl-β-cyanoalanine (6.9 g) levels were at the lower range of previous reports, while tannin levels (8.1 g total tannins/kg dry matter) were at the higher end. A vetch-free control and experimental diets containing 75, 100 and 125 g common vetch seeds/kg of diet were fed during the grower (day 29–49) and finisher (day 50–70) period of two consecutive fattening periods, to a total of 8 groups of 20 mixed-sex broilers per treatment. No differences in feed intake, animal performance and welfare status were found, therefore including up to 125 g common vetch seeds/kg of diet can be recommended. Based on a comparison of the ANF contents with previous reports, higher inclusion rates should be possible, as negative effects can be expected at 350 g common vetch seeds/kg of diet, which is higher than necessary in diet formulation anyway.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Höhne, A., Machner, M. T., Aulrich, K., Bussemas, R., & Baldinger, L. (2025). Effect of differing proportions of protein-rich common vetch seeds (Vicia sativa L. cultivar Slovena) in organic diets for broiler chickens. Organic Agriculture, 15(3), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-025-00511-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free