Projection effects in cluster catalogues

88Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigate the importance of projection effects in the identification of galaxy clusters in 2D galaxy maps and their effect on the estimation of cluster velocity dispersions. From large N-body simulations of a standard cold dark matter universe, we construct volume-limited galaxy catalogues that have similar low-order clustering properties to those of the observed galaxy distribution. We then select clusters using criteria tailored to match those employed in the construction of real cluster catalogues such as Abell's. We find that our mock Abell cluster catalogues are heavily contaminated and incomplete. Over one third (34 ± 6 per cent) of clusters of richness class R ≥ 1 are misclassifications arising from the projection of one or more subclumps on to an intrinsically poor cluster. Conversely, 32±5 per cent of intrinsically rich clusters are missed altogether from the R ≥ 1 catalogues, mostly because of statistical fluctuations in the background count. Selection by X-ray luminosity rather than by optical richness reduces, but does not completely eliminate, these problems. Contamination by unvirialized subclumps near a cluster leads to an overestimation of the cluster velocity dispersion which can be very substantial even if the analysis is restricted only to galaxies close to the cluster centre. Thus, the distribution of cluster masses - often used to test cosmological models - is a highly unreliable statistic. The median value of the distribution, however, is considerably more robust because the main effect of contamination is to create an artificial tail of high velocity dispersion clusters. Improved estimates of the cluster velocity dispersion distribution require construction of new cluster catalogues in which clusters are defined according to the number of galaxies within a radius about three times smaller than the Abell radius. © 1997 RAS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Haarlem, M. P., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997). Projection effects in cluster catalogues. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 287(4), 817–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/287.4.817

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free