Objective: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference between stainless steel and low-nickel stainless steel wires as regards mechanical behavior. Force, resilience, and elastic modulus produced by Quadhelix appliances made of 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch wires were evaluated. Methods: Sixty Quad-helix appliances were made, thirty for each type of alloy, being fifteen for each wire thickness, 0.032-in and 0.036-in. All the archwires were submitted to mechanical compression test using an EMIC DL-10000 machine simulating activations of 4, 6, 9, and 12 mm. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparisons and Tukey's test were used (p < 0.05) to assess force, resilience, and elastic modulus. Results: Statistically significant difference in the forces generated, resilience and elastic modulus were found between the 0.032-in 0.036-in thicknesses (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Appliances made of lownickel stainless steel alloy had force, resilience, and elastic modulus similar to those made of stainless steel alloy. © 2013 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics.
CITATION STYLE
dos Santos, R. L., & Pithon, M. M. (2013). Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 18(3), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000300007
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.