Antiphospholipid antibody tests: Spreading the net

65Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the hypothesis that testing for new antiphospholipid antibody specificities may help to identify the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with thrombosis who are repeatedly negative for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and/or lupus anticoagulant (LA). Methods: Three groups of patients with SLE were studied: (a) SLE/APS (n = 56): 51 female, mean (SD) age 46 (11) years, fulfilling 1999 Sapporo criteria for the APS; (b) SLE/thrombosis (n = 56): 53 female, age 42.6 (12) years, all with a history of thrombosis and persistently negative for aCL and/or LA; (c) SLE only (n = 56): 53 female, age 40 (11) years, without a history of thrombotic events. aCL and LA were retested in all samples. All patients were tested for anti-β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) and antiprothrombin antibodies (aPT) by coating prothrombin on irradiated plates or using phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex as the antigen (aPS-PT). Results: Anti-β2GPI were only present in patients from the SLE/APS group, all of whom were also positive for aCL. aPT and aPS-PT were also more commonly found in SLE/APS than in SLE/thrombosis or SLE only groups (54% v 5%, p<0.0001 or v 16%, p<0.0001 for aPT and 63% v 2%, p<0.0001 or v 11%, p<0.0001 for aPS-PT, respectively). No differences were found between SLE/thrombosis and SLE only groups (p = 1.5 for β2GPI, p = 0.1 for aPT, and p = 0.1 for aPS-PT). Conclusion: Testing for aPT in patients with SLE with thrombosis, but persistently negative for aCL and LA, may be helpful in some selected cases. Anti- β2GPI are not present in patients who are negative for aCL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bertolaccini, M. L., Gomez, S., Pareja, J. F. P., Theodoridou, A., Sanna, G., Hughes, G. R. V., & Khamashta, M. A. (2005). Antiphospholipid antibody tests: Spreading the net. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 64(11), 1639–1643. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2005.035824

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free