Sex differences in birth defects: A study of opposite-sex twins

35Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in structural birth defects are often confounded by environmental risk factors. Opposite-sex twins provide a unique model for detecting sex differences in birth defects while maximally controlling environmental risk factors in a natural setting. METHODS: Population data from the Florida Birth Defects Registry were analyzed. A total of 4768 pairs of twins who were discordant for sex and born between 1996 and 2001 were analyzed. The McNemar test was used to compare the differences between a male twin and his twin sister for the risk of developing specific defects and organ-system defects. RESULTS: Of 4768 twin pairs, 225 males (4.72%) and 175 females (3.67%) had birth defects. Among opposite-sex twin pairs, males had a 29% higher risk for birth defects than their twin sisters. Compared to their twin sisters, males had a 5.4 times higher risk for pyloric stenosis and a 2.4 times higher risk for obstructive genitourinary defect, but only one-tenth the risk for congenital hip dislocation. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in birth defects exist between opposite-sex twins. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cui, W., Ma, C. X., Tang, Y., Chang, V., Rao, P. V., Ariet, M., … Roth, J. (2005). Sex differences in birth defects: A study of opposite-sex twins. Birth Defects Research Part A - Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 73(11), 876–880. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20196

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free