Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting bleeding risk in patients with pulmonary embolism

0Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Bleeding during anticoagulation therapy represents a critical challenge in pulmonary embolism (PE) management, this study aimed to develop and validate a PE-specific bleeding risk prediction model. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized a clinical research big data platform, including 5,632 hospitalized PE patients (January 2013–December 2024). Significant bleeding within 6 months served as the primary outcome. After excluding variables with >20% missingness, 29 predictors were analyzed. The cohort was randomly split into development (n = 3,942) and validation sets (n = 1,690). LASSO regression identified key predictors, with multivariable logistic regression constructing the final model. Performance was assessed via AUC-ROC, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The final model identified six predictors: prior bleeding history, renal insufficiency, red blood cell count, systolic pressure, cerebral infarction, and creatinine. The model demonstrated robust discrimination (development AUC: 0.756, 95%CI: 0.729–0.784; validation AUC: 0.729, 95%CI: 0.685–0.773) and calibration (validation slope: 0.810). DCA confirmed significant net benefit at 5–35% thresholds, with 30% as the optimal cut-off. At this threshold, the model reduced major bleeding by 42% versus standard care. Conclusion: This novel PE-specific bleeding risk tool provides clinically actionable stratification, enabling personalized anticoagulation intensity adjustment. Implementation may reduce hemorrhage-related morbidity while optimizing resource utilization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ye, T., Lei, W., Wang, M., & Xu, L. (2025). Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting bleeding risk in patients with pulmonary embolism. Frontiers in Medicine, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1692156

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free