Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation

602Citations
Citations of this article
315Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present an automatic approach to tree annotation in which basic nonterminal symbols are alternately split and merged to maximize the likelihood of a training treebank. Starting with a simple X-bar grammar, we learn a new grammar whose nonterminals are subsymbols of the original nonterminals. In contrast with previous work, we are able to split various terminals to different degrees, as appropriate to the actual complexity in the data. Our grammars automatically learn the kinds of linguistic distinctions exhibited in previous work on manual tree annotation. On the other hand, our grammars are much more compact and substantially more accurate than previous work on automatic annotation. Despite its simplicity, our best grammar achieves an F1 of 90.2% on the Penn Treebank, higher than fully lexicalized systems. © 2006 Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petrov, S., Barrett, L., Thibaux, R., & Klein, D. (2006). Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In COLING/ACL 2006 - 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 433–440). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1220175.1220230

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free