Comparison between magnetic coplanarity and MVA methods in determining the normal of Venusian bow shock

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

With the measurements of magnetic field of Venus Express (VEX), magnetic coplanarity and minimum variance analysis (MVA) methods are analyzed and their validity is tested to determine the normal of Venusian bow shocks. It is found that MVA method is the better than magnetic coplanarity, and 95% shock crossings can be accurately determined by the method. However, the occurrence of the shock normal which is not determined accurately by magnetic coplanarity increases with the decrease of the solar zenith angle (SZA). At the same time, compared with quasi-parallel shocks, there is more occurrence of the shock normal which cannot be determined accurately by magnetic coplanarity for quasi-perpendicular shocks. © 2013 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shan, L. C., Lu, Q. M., Zhang, T. L., Gao, X. L., Huang, C., Su, Y. Q., & Wang, S. (2013). Comparison between magnetic coplanarity and MVA methods in determining the normal of Venusian bow shock. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(20), 2469–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5675-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free