Abstract
In this article, we build on Gaddis (2017a) by illuminating a key variable plausibly related to racial perceptions of last names-geography. We show that the probability that any individual belongs to a race is conditional not only on their last name but also on surrounding racial demographics. Specifically, we demonstrate that the probability of a name denoting a race varies considerably across contexts, and this is more of a problem for some names than others. This result has two important implications for audit study research: it suggests important limitations for (1) the generalizability of audit study findings and (2) for the interpretation of geography-based conditional effects. This means that researchers should be careful to select names that consistently signal racial groups regardless of local demographics. We provide a slim R package that can help researchers do this.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Crabtree, C., & Chykina, V. (2018). Last name selection in audit studies. Sociological Science, 5, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.15195/v5.a2
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.