Parametric reliability analysis of no-underfill flip chip package

13Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This research proposes a parametric analysis for a flip chip package with a constraint-layer structure. Previous research has shown that flip-chip type packages with organic substrates require underfill for achieving adequate reliability life. Although underfill encapsulant is needed to improve the reliability of flip chip solder joint interconnects, it will also increase the difficulty of reworkability, increase the packaging cost and decrease the manufacturing throughput. This research is based on the fact that if the thermal mismatch between the silicon die and the organic substrate could be minimized, then the reliability of the solder joint could be accordingly enhanced. This research proposes a structure using a ceramic-like material with CTE close to silicon, mounted on the backside of the substrate to constrain the thermal expansion of the organic substrate. The ceramic-like material could reduce the thermal mismatch between silicon die and substrate, thereby enhancing the reliability life of the solder joint. Furthermore, in order to achieve better reliability design of this flip chip package, a parametric analysis using finite element analysis is performed for package design. The design parameters of the flip chip package include die size, substrate size/material, and constraint-layer size/material, etc. The results show that this constraint-layer structure could make the solder joints of the package achieve the same range of reliability as the conventional underfill material. More importantly, the flip chip package without underfill material could easily solve the reworkbility problem, enhance the thermal dissipation capability and also improve the manufacturing throughput.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiang, K. N., Liu, Z. N., & Peng, C. T. (2001). Parametric reliability analysis of no-underfill flip chip package. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 24(4), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1109/6144.974953

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free