Adaptive preferences, self-expression and preference-based freedom rankings

Abstract

If preference-based freedom rankings are based on all-Things-considered preferences, they risk judging phenomena of adaptive preferences as freedom enhancing. As a remedy, it has been suggested to base preference-based freedom rankings on reasonable preferences. But this approach is also problematic. This article argues that the quest for a remedy is unnecessary. All-Things-considered preferences retain information on whether the availability of an option contributes to the value that freedom has for a person's self-expression. If preference-based freedom rankings use all-Things-considered preferences to evaluate whether an option contributes to a person's self-expression, they are immune to the problem posed by adaptive preferences.