Use of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency for identifying children with motor impairment

43Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study compared the consistency of the Short Form (SF) and the Long Form (LF) of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP) in identifying preschool children with motor impairment (MI). One hundred and forty-four Greek preschool children participated (74 males, 70 females; mean age 5y 2mo [SD 5mo], range 4y 6mo-5y 6mo). Although total SF and LF scores were highly correlated (r=0.85), paired t-tests indicated significant differences (t=-27.466, p=0.001). SF total scores (mean 58.72 [SD 7.28]) were higher than LF total scores (mean 47.38 [SD 9.43]). SF had low sensitivity (13.6%) and negative predictive value (72.5%) for identifying MI. The BOTMP-SF does not appear to be a valid test for the identification of MI in 5-year-old children. © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Venetsanou, F., Kambas, A., Aggeloussis, N., Serbezis, V., & Taxildaris, K. (2007). Use of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency for identifying children with motor impairment. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49(11), 846–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00846.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free