Should single- or two-stage revision surgery be used for the management of an infected total knee replacement? A critical review of the literature

  • Clement N
  • Burnett R
  • Breusch S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction A post-operative periprosthetic infection of total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most devastating complications for a patient to endure after surgery and is a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon to treat. In this paper, we present the current evidence to support a single-stage revision of a TKR for periprosthetic infection and compare the outcome with that of a two-stage revision procedure. In addition, we also outline the methods of diagnosis used to identify a periprosthetic infection of a TKR. Conclusion The current evidence-based surgical options to manage periprosthetic infection do not offer a 100% guarantee of eradication of the infection. As to whether a single- or a two-stage procedure should be undertaken needs to be personalized to each patient and their circumstances.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clement, N., Burnett, R., & Breusch, S. (2013). Should single- or two-stage revision surgery be used for the management of an infected total knee replacement? A critical review of the literature. OA Orthopaedics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.13172/2052-9627-1-1-528

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free