Index of perforation of procedure/surgical gloves used by workers in the purging of a material and sterilization center

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to identify the types of gloves the nursing team uses for the manual cleaning of health products and to identify the perforation rates in procedure/surgical gloves used for this purpose. Cross-sectional and descriptive, descriptive study with quantitative approach was developed at a large hospital in Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. In total, 300 procedure/surgical gloves (Group A), 100 procedure and 100 new surgical gloves (Group B), and six nitrile gloves (Group C) were analyzed. Among the gloves in Group A, 135 (45.0%) were perforated. Superposition of gloves did not prevent perforations and, the longer they were used, the higher the index of perforation (p<0.05). No perforations were identified in Group B, whereas there were four perforations in 48 hours of use in Group C. This study reinforces the idea that procedure/surgical gloves are inappropriate for cleaning health products, representing an ineffective barrier for the safety of workers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trindade, J. P. D. A., da Serra, J. R., & Tipple, A. F. V. (2016). Index of perforation of procedure/surgical gloves used by workers in the purging of a material and sterilization center. Texto e Contexto Enfermagem, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072016001410015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free