The role of sham continuous positive airway pressure as a placebo in controlled trials: Best Apnea Interventions for Research Trial

22Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study Objectives: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the role of sham continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared to conservative medical therapy (CMT) as a control arm in the Best Apnea Interventions for Research (BestAIR) study by assessing differences in subjectively and objectively measured outcomes, adverse events, adherence, and retention rates. Methods: BestAIR is a clinical trial aimed to identify important design features for future randomized controlled trials of CPAP. Participants with obstructive sleep apnea were randomized to one of four groups; two control arms (CMT, sham-CPAP) and two active CPAP arms (with and without behavioral interventions). Blood pressure and health-related quality of life outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Study outcomes, retention, and adverse event rates were compared between the two control arms. Sham-CPAP adherence and self-efficacy were also compared to active-CPAP adherence (without behavioral intervention). Results: Our sample included 86 individuals in the control arms and 42 participants in the active-CPAP arm. There were no differences in longitudinal profiles in blood pressure, health-related quality of life outcomes, dropout rates, or adverse events in sham-CPAP group compared to CMT-only group (all ps > 0.05); standardized differences were generally small and with inconsistent directionality across measurements. When compared to active-CPAP, sham-CPAP was associated with 93 fewer minutes/night of usage over 12 months (p = 0.007) and lower outcome expectations (p < 0.05). Conclusion: We observed no evidence of differences in objectively or subjectively measured outcomes with the use of sham-CPAP compared to CMT group. The lower adherence on sham-CPAP and poorer self-efficacy compared to active-CPAP may suggest differences in perceived benefit. Registration: NCT 01261390 Best Apnea Interventions for Research (BestAIR) www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reid, M. L., Gleason, K. J., Bakker, J. P., Wang, R., Mittleman, M. A., & Redline, S. (2019). The role of sham continuous positive airway pressure as a placebo in controlled trials: Best Apnea Interventions for Research Trial. Sleep, 42(8). https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsz099

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free