Engaging Epistemically with the Other: Toward a More Dialogical and Plural Understanding of the Remedy for Testimonial Injustice

Abstract

The concept of testimonial injustice (TI) has been expanded considerably since Fricker's groundbreaking original formulation.Testimonial void (TV), as well as other kinds of TI identified in the last decade, encourage the idea that the virtue of testimonial justice (TJ) is not the appropriate remedy to battle against injustice in our testimonial exchanges.This paper contributes to the existing literature on the limitations of TJ as the remedy for TI by drawing attention to its shortcomings in the context of other kinds of TI.By contrast, I propose further engaging epistemically with the other (EE) as a corrective to injustice in our testimonial exchanges.I understand EE as a practice in which information regarding epistemic injustice, strategies to fight it and skills training play the leading roles.If the problem lies in lack of appropriate epistemic interaction between knowers, we need to train ourselves to do what we fail to do.Given that we are in the domain of testimony, EE essentially amounts to engaging further with the other in conversation.In the process, EE sheds light on the need for second-order change to fight TI, as enacting EE would require the transformation of our concepts of testimony and credibility.