Low-dose aspirin and sporadic anovulation in the EAGeR randomized trial

13Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context: Among women with a single, recent pregnancy loss, daily preconception low-dose aspirin (LDA) increased the live birth rate with no effect on pregnancy loss. Ovulation is a potentialmechanism underlying this effect. Objective:Weestimated the effect of LDA on the per-cycle risk of anovulation among eumenorrheic women. Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of daily LDA on reproductive outcomes. Preconception follow-up lasted 1 to 6 menstrual cycles (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00467363). Setting: Four US medical centers during 2007 to 2011. Patients or Other Participants: Healthy women (n = 1214), age 18 to 40, were attempting pregnancy, had regular menstrual cycles (21 to 42 days), and had a history of 1 to 2 documented pregnancy losses, ≤2 live births, and no infertility. All participants completed at least 1 menstrual cycle of follow-up; none withdrew due to adverse events. Intervention: Aspirin (81 mg) daily for 1 to 6 menstrual cycles. Main Outcome Measure: Per-cycle risk of anovulation, defined as the absence of both a positive spot-urine pregnancy test and a luteinizing hormone (LH) peak (2.5-fold increase in daily urinary LH). Hypothesis formulation preceded data collection. Results: Among4340cycles, LDAwasnotassociatedwithanovulation(LDA:13.4%, placebo: 11.1%;riskratio= 1.16, 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.52). Results were similar among women with a single, recent loss. Conclusions: Daily LDA had no effect on anovulation among women with a history of 1 to 2 pregnancy losses. LDA may affect fertility via other pathways, and these warrant further study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Radin, R. G., Sjaarda, L. A., Perkins, N. J., Silver, R. M., Chen, Z., Lesher, L. L., … Schisterman, E. F. (2017). Low-dose aspirin and sporadic anovulation in the EAGeR randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 102(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2095

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free