Rootstock, Pruning, and Soil Fumigation in Relation to Dormancy and Cold Hardiness of `Redhaven' Peach

  • Harber R
  • Nyczepir A
  • Yadava U
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The effects of rootstock, pruning, and preplant soil fumigation on floral bud dormancy status and shoot cold hardiness of `Redhaven' peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] trees were monitored. Dormancy status, expressed as percent floral budbreak, was significantly affected by rootstock and pruning, although differences were small. In late January, significant interactions occurred between rootstock and pruning treatments, as well as between pruning and soil treatments. Pruning of trees on Lovell rootstock resulted in significantly lower budbreak as compared to trees on Nemaguard and unpruned trees on Lovell. Also, for trees pruned in December, higher budbreak was associated with those growing in fumigated vs. nonfumigated soil. Treatment effects on dormancy status did not correspond with treatment effects on hardiness. In fact, differences in hardiness were minimal and probably not biologically meaningful.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harber, R. M., Nyczepir, A. P., Yadava, U. L., & Sharpe, R. R. (2019). Rootstock, Pruning, and Soil Fumigation in Relation to Dormancy and Cold Hardiness of `Redhaven’ Peach. HortScience, 27(2), 99–100. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.27.2.99

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free