Atrial electroanatomical remodeling as a determinant of different outcomes between two current ablation strategies: Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation vs pulmonary vein isolation

11Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the efficacy of the 2 different ablation techniques of atrial fibrillation (AF) and left atrial (LA) size. Methods and Results: A total of 81 patients with paroxysmal AF (n = 58) or persistent AF (n = 23) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs underwent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; n = 45) or PVI (n = 36) without respect to echocardiographic results for LA volume index (LAVI).Of the 81 patients,41 had less dilated LA (group 1; LAVI <27 cc/m2) and 40 had dilated LA (group 2; LAVI≥27 cc/m2). During the 9-month follow-up, 33 patients (73.3%) after circumferential PVI and 18 (50%) after PVI (P = .031) were free of arrhythmia. The risk of recurrence was associated with persistent AF, hypertension, LAVI>27 ml/m2, PVI, early recurrence of AF, and lower left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (all P value

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hwang, H. J., Lee, J. M., Joung, B., Lee, B. H., Kim, J. B., Lee, M. H., … Kim, S. S. (2010). Atrial electroanatomical remodeling as a determinant of different outcomes between two current ablation strategies: Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation vs pulmonary vein isolation. Clinical Cardiology, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20567

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free