Comparison of published guidelines for management of coagulopathy and thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID 19: Implications for clinical practice and future investigations

83Citations
Citations of this article
192Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Critically ill patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk for thrombotic complications which has led to an intense debate surrounding their anticoagulation management. In the absence of data from randomized controlled clinical trials, a number of consensus guidelines and recommendations have been published to facilitate clinical decision-making on this issue. However, substantive differences exist between these guidelines which can be difficult for clinicians. This review briefly summarizes the major societal guidelines and compares their similarities and differences. A common theme in all of the recommendations is to take an individualized approach to patient management and a call for prospective randomized clinical trials to address important anticoagulation issues in this population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flaczyk, A., Rosovsky, R. P., Reed, C. T., Bankhead-Kendall, B. K., Bittner, E. A., & Chang, M. G. (2020, September 16). Comparison of published guidelines for management of coagulopathy and thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID 19: Implications for clinical practice and future investigations. Critical Care. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03273-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free