Operator gender differences in major mechanical complications after central line insertions: a subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: A previous study on mechanical complications after central venous catheterisation demonstrated differences in complication rates between male and female operators. The objective of this subgroup analysis was to further investigate these differences. The hypothesis was that differences in distribution of predefined variables between operator genders could be identified. Methods: This was a subgroup analysis of a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study conducted between March 2019 and December 2020 including 8 586 patients ≥ 16 years receiving central venous catheters at four emergency care hospitals. The main outcome measure was major mechanical complications defined as major bleeding, severe cardiac arrhythmia, pneumothorax, arterial catheterisation, and persistent nerve injury. Independent t-test and χ2 test were used to investigate differences in distribution of major mechanical complications and predefined variables between male and female operators. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine association between operator gender and major mechanical complications. Results: Female operators had a lower rate of major mechanical complications than male operators (0.4% vs 0.8%, P =.02), were less experienced (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naddi, L., Hübinette, J., Kander, T., Borgquist, O., & Adrian, M. (2024). Operator gender differences in major mechanical complications after central line insertions: a subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study. BMC Anesthesiology, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02455-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free