Características clínicas y epidemiológicas de niños con enfermedad por Bordetella pertussis en Santa Fe, Argentina

  • Kusznierz G
  • Schmeling F
  • Cociglio R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of children with disease due to Bordetella pertussis in Santa Fe, Argentina Introduction: Pertussis, a vaccine-preventable respiratory disease, remains a public health problem. Objective: The goal of this study is to describe epidemiological and clinical patterns of B. pertussis-caused respiratory infection over the period 2006-2010 in Santa Fe, Argentina. Methods: Inpatients and outpatients < 14 years of age, meeting pertussis case definition criteria were included. Household family contacts of confirmed cases with compatible symptoms were also surveyed. Results: 1074 patients were evaluated, 102 (9.49%) were confirmed through PCR. The proportion of confirmed cases was: in 2006, 35.5%; 2007, 21.2%; 2008, 4.9%. In 2009 and 2010 no cases were detected. 94.2% of hospitalized patients and 42.8% of outpatients were less than six months of age. Of all patients, 67.6% required hospitalization as they had a moderate to severe illness. The length of stay for these patients was over six days. 27.5% had pre-existing medical conditions, the most frequent being prematurity and malnutrition. The outcome was severe in 23.1% of cases, all of whom hadn't started the vaccination schedule. Severe pulmonary hypertension was present in five patients. Fatality rate was 4.9%. Conclusions: Pertussis mainly affected children < 6 months, non-vaccinated or with less than 3 doses. The bacterium was also detected among adults and teenagers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kusznierz, G., Schmeling, F., Cociglio, R., Pierini, J., Molina, F., Ortellao, L., … Pía, A. (2014). Características clínicas y epidemiológicas de niños con enfermedad por Bordetella pertussis en Santa Fe, Argentina. Revista Chilena de Infectología, 31(4), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-10182014000400002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free