A Comparison of Small Sample Methods for Handshape Recognition Una Comparación de Métodos para Reconocimiento de Formas de Manos con Pocas Muestras

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Automatic Sign Language Translation (SLT) systems can be a great asset to improve the communication with and within deaf communities. Currently, the main issue preventing effective translation models lays in the low availability of labelled data, which hinders the use of modern deep learning models. SLT is a complex problem that involves many subtasks, of which hand-shape recognition is the most important. We compare a series of models specially tailored for small datasets to improve their performance on handshape recognition tasks. We evaluate Wide-DenseNet and few-shot Prototypical Network models with and without transfer learning, and also using Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML). Our findings indicate that Wide-DenseNet without transfer learning and Prototipical Networks with transfer learning provide the best re-sults. Prototypical networks, particularly, are vastly superior when using less than 30 samples, while Wide-DenseNet achieves the best results with more samples. On the other hand, MAML does not improve performance in any scenario. These results can help to design better SLT models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quiroga, F., Ronchetti, F., Fandos, U. J. C., Ríos, G. G., Dal Bianco, P., Hasperué, W., & Lanzarini, L. (2023). A Comparison of Small Sample Methods for Handshape Recognition Una Comparación de Métodos para Reconocimiento de Formas de Manos con Pocas Muestras. Journal of Computer Science and Technology(Argentina), 23(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.24215/16666038.23.e03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free