The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of second-line chemotherapy, especially combination chemotherapy, for advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. Patients and Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients who received second-line chemotherapy after disease progression during first-line chemotherapy between January 2009 to May 2018. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity associated with second-line chemotherapy were assessed. Results: In total 25 patients received second-line chemotherapy; 21 patients had combination chemotherapy and 4 had single-agent chemotherapy. Median PFS and OS were 3.6 months (range=0.2-23.5) and 11.9 months (range=0.5-29.0), respectively. Twenty patients (80%) exhibited grade 3 or more severe toxicities. Conclusion: PFS and OS benefits of second-line combination chemotherapy corresponded to those of the phase 3 study of pembrolizumab, but adverse events were more severe. Pembrolizumab is potentially a better second-line treatment than combination chemotherapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naito, R., Izumi, K., Kadomoto, S., Makino, T., Iwamoto, H., Yaegashi, H., … Mizokami, A. (2020). The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. Anticancer Research, 40(2), 1141–1146. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free